نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق جزا و جرمشناسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
2 گروه آموزشی حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
3 گروه حقوق جزا و جرمشناسی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The effective participation of the family in response to juvenile Hudud crimes leads to providing the interest of the juvenile; But the existence of challenges such as jurisprudential restrictions has prevented the growth of criminal policy. The main topic of this research is to investigate the legitimacy of using the strategy of attracting family participation in juvenile Hudud crimes. The main goal of this research is to investigate the capabilities of Imami jurisprudence to attract the effective participation of the family. This research is qualitative and the writer analyzes the mentioned issues by analyzing the information obtained from the examination of library sources in the field of Imami jurisprudence. These data clarify the current possibilities of jurisprudence - the mitigation in Hudud and Necessity of verifying penal growth -has made clear the legitimate scope of family participation in responding to Hudud crimes, and expanding its scope will depend on utilizing the capacities of dynamic jurisprudence. Suggested solutions for family participation such as mediation before the judge and the victim of the crime, are considered legitimate within a certain range. By proving the legitimacy of the use of tazir punishment in Hudud crimes, Arguing the legitimacy of using non-corporal punishments and confirming the legitimacy of imposing obligations on parents, It has become clear that sometimes the judicial authority can define the appropriate tazir answer in the context of the family or implement it with their help. Thus, the permissible scope is broader than the law, and legal reforms are necessary.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)