نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
دانشیار گروه مسائل فقهی وحقوقی، پژوهشکده فقه و حقوق، پژوهشگاه علوم و فرهنگ اسلامی، قم، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
With the approval of Article 56 of the Law on the Protection of the Family and the Youth of the Population, instead of the diagnosis of three specialist doctors, the issuance of abortion permit was entrusted to a commission consisting of a special judge, a committed specialist doctor, and a forensic pathologist. This study was conducted with the aim of jurisprudentially-legally investigating the new approach of the legislator in comparison with the previous approach and identifying its legal gaps and problems, as well as providing solutions to address those gaps using a descriptive-analytical method; thus, the data was collected by referring to related written texts and face-to-face interviews with doctors related to the diagnosis and the issuance of abortion permit. The results indicated that in the attempt to perform an abortion, there are three approaches: supporting the mother and those around her, supporting the fetus, and supporting the community. The jurisprudential approaches to the way of diagnosing a problem and performing an abortion, which itself is considered a basis for formulating laws, are numerous. In addition, policies governing population growth play an important role in formulating laws and restricting the issuance of abortion permit. Finally, involving judges in issuing abortion permits in addition to medical examinations is a new legislative experience in Iran that has led to numerous theoretical and practical problems.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
این مقاله برگرفته از پژوهشی است باعنوان «کاربرد قاعده نفی حرج در سقط قانونی (مبانی و معیارها)» که با پشتوانه مادی و معنوی پژوهشگاه علوم و فرهنگ اسلامی، پژوهشکده فقه و حقوق انجام شد.
)