نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشآموخته دکتری فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج، ایران.
2 دانشیار گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج. ایران.
3 دانشیار گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج، ایران.
4 استادیار گروه فقه و حقوق، دانشگاه شهید مطهری، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Objective: One of the important challenges in the family field is the issue of childbearing. Whether childbearing is a right or a ruling can be the basis for decision-making in various legal issues related to the family. The present study was conducted with the aim of examining the opinions of famous Imamiyyah jurists on the legal nature of childbearing, the conflict of this right with other spousal rights, and the motivational reasons for couples' refusal to have children.
Method: This research was conducted using an analytical-documentary method, and by examining written jurisprudential-legal sources, it analyzed the evidence and various perspectives in this field.
Results: The results of the investigations showed that childbearing is a right.
Conclusion: Some jurists have assigned the right to have children to women, and others to men. Each of the jurists has tried to cite evidence to prove their opinion, but the evidence for both views is subject to criticism. The perspective that seems comprehensive is that the right to childbearing is a shared right between spouses. This view can be strengthened by considering the diyah (blood money) being established for the one who performs 'azl (coitus interruptus), whether man or woman; the recommended status of marrying a fertile woman; and the lack of explicit Quranic verses and narratives indicating the obligation of childbearing. This perspective, considering Islamic custom and as a natural right of men and women, reduces disagreements about the legal nature of childbearing.
کلیدواژهها [English]
* قرآن کریم (1376). مترجم: مکارم شیرازی، ناصر، تهران: دارالقرآن الکریم.