نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشآموخته دکتری فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج، ایران.
2 دانشیار گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج. ایران.
3 دانشیار گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج، ایران.
4 استادیار گروه فقه و حقوق، دانشگاه شهید مطهری، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
One of the important challenges in the family field is the issue of childbearing. Whether childbearing is a right or a ruling can be the basis for decision-making in various legal issues related to the family. The present study was conducted with the aim of examining the opinions of famous Imamieh jurists on the ruling nature of childbearing and the conflict of this right with other couples' rights and the motivational reasons for couples' refusal to have children by an analytical-documentary method. For this purpose, written jurisprudential-legal sources on this issue were reviewed and the results showed that childbearing is a right. Some jurists have assigned the right to have children to women and others to men. Each of the jurists has tried to cite evidence in proving their opinion that the evidence of both views is subjected to criticism. The view that seems comprehensive is that the right to have children is a common right between married couples, which can be strengthened by considering the fact that blood money is due to the person who prevents the other one from having children, whether a man or a woman, the recommendation of marriage with a woman who gives birth a lot, and the absence of Quranic verses and narratives that state that having children is obligatory. This view, considering the Islamic custom and as a natural right of men and women, reduces the differences regarding the ruling nature of childbearing.
کلیدواژهها [English]
* قرآن کریم (1376). مترجم: مکارم شیرازی، ناصر، تهران: دارالقرآن الکریم.