The Psychometric Properties of the Marriage Assessment and Marital Counseling Questionnaire among Iranian Couples

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student in Counseling, Department of Counseling, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran. (Corresponding Author)

2 Professor, Department of Counseling, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

Abstract

The present research was conducted using factor analysis to investigate the psychometric properties of the marriage assessment and marital counseling questionnaire among Muslim societies, which has been standardized in Qatar. The population included married men and women in the cities of Zanjan and Qazvin in 2023, and 404 people were selected by the convenience sampling as the sample. The data were collected using the marriage assessment and marital counseling questionnaire, the ENRICH marital satisfaction scale, and the dyadic adjustment scale. In the data description section, frequency distribution tables, mean, and standard deviation were calculated and drawn, and in the inferential statistics section, SPSS was used for exploratory analysis, and LISREL was used in the confirmatory section. The content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by six experts in the field of psychometrics and counseling. According to the results, the criterion validity of the test (correlation with the ENRICH marital satisfaction scale and the dyadic adjustment scale) was 0.73 and 0.79, respectively, and was significant (P<0.001). The internal consistency coefficients using Cronbach's alpha for the entire questionnaire were 0.86. The results of the item-scale correlation coefficients indicated that this correlation was higher than minimum (0.20) for all items and the range of item-scale correlation was between 0.37 and 0.80. Examining the internal validity of the questionnaire using confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis gave four factors, one less than the original version. Accordingly, its title was changed into the marriage assessment and marital counseling questionnaire among Iranian couples. Therefore, this questionnaire has the necessary capabilities to assess the marriage of Iranian couples and families and can be used for consulting and research purposes.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Aghajanian, A., & Thompson, V. (2013). Recent divorce trend in Iran. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 54(2), 112- https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2012.752687
  2. Aicha, S. K., & Bachir, D. (2023). The educational level and its effect on achieving marital harmony. https://dspace. univ-ouargla. dz/jspui/handle/123456789/33780
  3. Ali, A. A., Mahmood, K., Javaid, Z. K., & Athar, M. (2024). Conflict resolution, psychological well- being and marital satisfaction among spouses of working people. Pakistan Journal of Law, Analysis and Wisdom, 3(2), 183- 191.
  4. Anyamene, A. (2020). Relationship between emotional intelligence and Marital Satisfaction of male and female married teachers in Anambra state. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(3), 1- 16. http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v7no3a1
  5. Apriliani, T., Wulandari, D., & Hamzah, I. (2024). The Reasons Why Love Languages are Quite Influential on Marital Harmony. In Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Psychology, ISPsy 2023, 18-19. ‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.7-18.18-7-2023.2343417
  6. Aqila, S., & Sugitanata, A. (2024). Harmony of emotional intelligence and spiritual maturity in the journey of married life: A Synthesis of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi's Life Balance Theory and Maqashid Shariah. An-Nubuwwah:Journal of Islamic Studies, 3(1), 1- ‏
  7. Busby, D. M., Spencer, S., Butler, M. H., & Anderson, S. R. (2024). Sexual beliefs in couple relationships: Exploring the pathways of mindfulness, communication, and sexual functioning on sexual passion and satisfaction. Family process, 63(1), 130- 150.
  8. Chi, P., Epstein, N. B., Fang, X., Lam, D. O. B., & Li, X. (2013). Similarity of relationship standards, couple communication patterns, and marital satisfaction among Chinese couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(5), 806– 816. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034113
  9. Cohen P., West S. G., & Aiken L. S. (2014). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774441
  10. Fowers, B. J., & Olson, D. H. (1986). Predicting marital success with PREPARE: A predictive validity study. Journal of marital and family therapy, 12(4), 403- 413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1986.tb00673.x
  11. Fowers, B. J., & Olson, D. H. (1993). ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Scale: A brief research and clinical tool. Journal of Family psychology, 7(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.7.2.176
  12. Ghorbani, S., Arefi, M., & Afsharinia, K. (2022). Comparing the effect of behavioral and solution-focused couple therapy on marital conflicts, sexual intimacy, marital harmony, and disharmony. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy, 12(1), 25- 60. ‏ 22034/fcp.2022.62717
  13. Halford, W. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2013). Effects of relationship education on maintenance of couple relationship satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(4), 512- 525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.02.001
  14. Huston, T. L. (2000). The social ecology of marriage and other intimate unions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 298- 320.
  15. Jalali, B. (2005). Iranian families. Ethnicity and family therapy,3, 451-467.
  16. Kaiser, B. N., Kohrt, B. A., Keys, H. M., Khoury, N. M., & Brewster, A. R. T. (2013). Strategies for assessing mental health in Haiti: Local instrument development and transcultural translation. Transcultural Psychiatry, 50(4), 532- 558. http://10.1177/1363461513502697
  17. Karananeethi, A., Prihadi, K. D., Ho, Y. M., Shoba, C., Nesan, G., Cahyanti, Y., & Surjaningrum, E. R. (2024). Achieving relationship satisfaction: household gender equality and mattering. International Journal of Public Health Science, 13(1), 384- 376.https://doi.org/10.11591/ijphs.v13i1.23214
  18. Leavitt, C. E., Maurer, T. F., Clyde, T. L., Clarke, R. W., Busby, D. M., Yorgason, J. B., ... & James, S. (2021). Linking sexual mindfulness to mixed-sex couples’ relational flourishing, sexual harmony, and orgasm. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(6), 2589- 2602. ‏
  19. Leonhardt, N. D., Busby, D. M., & Valdez, C. (2020). Pursuit of harmony: Relational and individual predictors of sexual passion expression. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1-16 .DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01769-w. ‏
  20. Montesino, M. L. C., Gómez, J. L. G., Fernández, M. E. P., & Rodríguez, J. M. A. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) in a community sample of couples. Psicothema, 25(4), 536- 541. DOI: 7334/psicothema2013.85
  21. Niehuis, S., Davis, K., Reifman, A., Callaway, K., Luempert, A., Oldham, C. R., & Willis-Grossmann, E. (2024). Psychometric evaluation of single-item relationship satisfaction, love, conflict, and commitment measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 50(3), 387- 405. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221133693
  22. Parra-Cardona, J. R., & Busby, D. M. (2006). Exploring Relationship Functioning in Premarital Caucasian and Latino/a Couples: Recognizing and Valuing Cultural Differences. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 37(3), 345- 357.
  23. Pham, M. N., Barbaro, N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015), Development and initial validation of the coalitional mate retention inventory. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1 (1), 4-12. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s40806-014-0001-5
  24. Soliman, A., Abdel-Salam, A. S. G., & Ahmed, M. (2022). A diagnostic tool for family and marriage counseling with Muslim couples. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1- 9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01201-9.
  25. Spanier, G. B. (1983). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 15- https://doi.org/10.2307/350547
  26. Sue, D. W., Sue, D., Neville, H. A., & Smith, L. (2022). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  27. Van Widenfelt, B. M., Treffers, P. D., De Beurs, E., Siebelink, B. M. & Koudijs, E. (2005). Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of assessment instruments used in psychological research with children and families. Clinical child and family psychology review, 8(2), 135- 147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-005-4752-1

Waltz, C. F., & Bausell, B. R. (1981). Nursing research: design statistics and computer analysis. Davis Fa.

The Islamic Journal Of Women and The Family
Volume 12, Issue 3 - Serial Number 36
September 2024
Pages 31-58

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics